Epilepsy and the risk of adverse cardiovascular events: A nationwide cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Epilepsy is associated with higher morbidity and mortality compared to people without epilepsy. We performed a retrospective cross-sectional and longitudinal cohort study to evaluate cardiovascular comorbidity and incident vascular events in people with epilepsy (PWE). METHODS: Data were extracted from the French Hospital National Database. PWE (n = 682,349) who were hospitalized between January 2014 and December 2022 were matched on age, sex, and year of hospitalization with 682,349 patients without epilepsy. Follow-up was conducted from the date of first hospitalization with epilepsy until the date of each outcome or date of last news in the absence of the outcome. Primary outcome was the incidence of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for heart failure, ischaemic stroke (IS), new onset atrial fibrillation, sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation (VT/VF), and cardiac arrest. RESULTS: A diagnosis of epilepsy was associated with higher numbers of cardiovascular risk factors and adverse cardiovascular events compared to controls. People with epilepsy had a higher incidence of all-cause death (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 2.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.67-2.72), cardiovascular death (IRR = 2.16, 95% CI = 2.11-2.20), heart failure (IRR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.25-1.28), IS (IRR = 2.08, 95% CI = 2.04-2.13), VT/VF (IRR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.04-1.16), and cardiac arrest (IRR = 2.12, 95% CI = 2.04-2.20). When accounting for all-cause death as a competing risk, subdistribution hazard ratios for ischaemic stroke of 1.59 (95% CI = 1.55-1.63) and for cardiac arrest of 1.73 (95% CI = 1.58-1.89) demonstrated higher risk in PWE. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence and incident rates of cardiovascular outcomes were significantly higher in PWE. Targeting cardiovascular health could help reduce excess morbidity and mortality in PWE.

The Role of the Wearable Defibrillator in Heart Failure.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Wearable cardioverter defibrillators (WCDs) have been developed as a temporary measure for protecting patients at risk for sudden cardiac death that do not meet the indication for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), most notably in the early stages of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction before reassessment of their left ventricular ejection fraction. In this review, we report available evidence in the literature and guidelines regarding WCD use in order to try to define the role WCDs may have in heart failure. RECENT FINDINGS: In the last decade, most observational studies found WCDs to be both safe and effective in terminating ventricular arrhythmias in various indications, mostly centered around heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. The only available randomized controlled trial using WCD did not however show a benefit on patients' survival. Hence, recent guidelines only recommended its use in limited indications. Recent data also suggest a possible interest of WCD in monitoring patients, a finding that may prove useful in the context of new-onset heart failure. Data regarding WCD benefit is scarce, and definitive conclusions on its utility are hard to draw. In the context of heart failure, and particularly new-onset heart failure, WCD might find a role in a global comprehensive management of the disease, both acting as an educational tool, a monitoring tool, and, most importantly, a safe and effective tool in preventing sudden cardiac death. The low level of evidence however invites caution, and the decision of prescribing a WCD needs to be individualized and thoroughly discussed with the patient whose compliance is key with this device.

Outcomes in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Known Sleep Apnea: A Nationwide Analysis.

Background. Sleep apnea (SA) is a common breathing disorder characterized by repetitive upper airway narrowing and closure. Although SA has been demonstrated to be an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality, the direct contribution of SA to worse cardiovascular prognosis may be difficult to evaluate, and its independent association with the different types of cardiovascular outcomes may be debated, particularly in the context of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The aim of this study was to assess the impact of known SA on the outcomes of hospitalized patients who have had an AMI by analyzing 10-year data collected from a national registry. Methods. This longitudinal cohort study was based on the national hospitalization database that covers hospital care for the entire French population, including all patients admitted with AMI from January 2010 to June 2019. The clinical outcomes for the analysis were as follows: all-cause death, cardiovascular death, ischemic stroke, new-onset atrial fibrillation (FA), and re-hospitalization for heart failure (HF). Results. Among the 797,212 patients who presented with an AMI (528,351 men and 268,861 women), 37,075 (4.7%) had documented SA. During follow-up (mean [SD] 1.8 [2.4] years, median [interquartile range] 0.7 [0.1-3.1] years), 163,845 deaths (of which 85,649 were cardiovascular deaths), 20,168 ischemic strokes, 58,498 new-onset AF, and 92,381 rehospitalizations due to HF were recorded. Patients with known SA had a worse prognosis in the short and medium term, but after adjusting for all covariables, SA was only independently associated with a higher risk of rehospitalization for HF and new-onset AF in men and women. Conclusion. Data from our large nationwide analysis confirm that known SA is associated with poor cardiovascular outcomes in patients who have had an AMI. However, this impact is tem-pered when the model is adjusted for age, cardiovascular risk, or other covariables. Further studies need to be conducted to assess the independent impact of SA on the prognosis of patients with AMI.

Ventricular arrhythmias and cardiac arrest in atrial fibrillation patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been linked to ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and sudden death, but few studies have specifically explored this association. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether AF is associated with an increased risk of ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF) and cardiac arrests (CA) in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). METHODS: All patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) hospitalised between 2010 and 2020 were identified from the French National database. Patients with a prior history of VT/VF/CA were excluded. RESULTS: 701,195 patients were identified initially. After excluding 55,688 patients, 581,781 (90.1%) and 63,726 (9.9%) remained in the pacemaker and ICD groups respectively. 248,046 (42.6%) pacemaker patients had AF and 333,735 (57.4%) had no AF, whereas in the ICD group 20,965 (32.9%) had AF and 42,761 (67.1%) had no AF. The incidence of VT/VF/CA was higher in AF patients compared to non-AF patients both in pacemaker (1.47%/year vs. 0.94%/year) and ICD (5.30%/year vs. 4.21%/year) groups. After multivariable analysis, AF was independently associated with an increased risk of VT/VF/CA in pacemaker (HR 1.236 [95% CI 1.198-1.276]) and ICD (HR 1.167 [95% CI 1.111-1.226]) patients. This risk was still significant in the 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis of the pacemaker (n = 200,977 per subgroup) and ICD cohorts (n = 18,349 per subgroup), HR 1.230 [95% CI 1.187-1.274] and HR 1.134 [95% CI 1.071-1.200] respectively and in the competing risk analysis (pacemaker: HR 1.195 (95% CI 1.154-1.238], ICD: HR 1.094 [95% CI 1.034-1.157]). CONCLUSION: CIED patients with AF have a higher risk of VT/VF/CA compared to CIED patients without AF.

Comparison of first- and second-generation leadless pacemakers in patients with sinus rhythm and complete atrioventricular block.

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy and safety of leadless cardiac pacemakers (LPMs) as an alternative to conventional transvenous cardiac pacing have been largely reported. The first generation of the MicraTM transcatheter pacing system (VR; Medtronic) was able to provide single-chamber VVI(R) pacing mode only, with a potential risk of pacemaker syndrome in sinus rhythm patients. A second-generation system (AV) now provides atrioventricular synchrony through atrial mechanical (Am) sensing capability (VDD mode). OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare VR and AV systems in sinus rhythm patients with chronic ventricular pacing (Vp) for complete atrioventricular block. METHODS: All consecutive patients implanted with an LPM in our department for complete atrioventricular block were retrospectively screened. Patients with atrial fibrillation, sinus dysfunction, or Vp burden <20% at 1 month postimplantation were excluded. Patients were systematically followed with a visit at 1 month, and then at least once a year. RESULTS: A total of 93 patients-45 VR (2015-2020) and 48 AV (2020-2021)-were included. VR and AV patients had similar baseline characteristics, except for VR patients being older (80 ± 8 vs. 77 ± 9 years, p = 0.049). The mean Vp burden was 77% in the VR and 82% in the AV group (p = 0.38). In AV patients, the median AV synchronous beats rate was 78%, with 65% having a >66% rate. An E/A ratio <1.2 as measured on echocardiography was the only independent predictor of accurate atrial mechanical tracking (p = 0.01). One-year survival rate was similar in both groups. Five patients in the VR and 0 in the AV group eventually developed pacemaker syndrome within 1 year post-implantation (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: In sinus rhythm patients with chronic Vp for complete atrioventricular block implanted with an LPM, the atrial mechanical sensing algorithm allowed significant atrioventricular synchrony in most patients and was associated with no occurrence of-otherwise rare-pacemaker syndrome.

Leadless cardiac pacing: Results from a large single-centre experience.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of leadless cardiac pacing as an alternative to conventional transvenous cardiac pacing in selected patients have been widely reported. AIM: To report the experience of a high-volume implantation centre with older and new generations of leadless pacemakers. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included the first consecutive 400 patients who underwent implantation of a leadless pacemaker in our centre. Complications and electrical parameters were evaluated during follow-up, comparing patients implanted with first-generation (Micra™ VR) and second-generation (Micra™ AV) leadless pacemakers (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Data were collected by a review of medical files. RESULTS: Among 400 procedures, there were 328 Micra™ VR pacemakers and 72 Micra™ AV pacemakers implanted, followed for a median of 16 months (694 patient-years). The mean age was 77 years and both groups had a high burden of co-morbidities. Implantation success rate was 99.5%. A total of 87.5% of patients were discharged the day after the procedure. The pacing threshold remained stable and<2V in 96.5% of all patients. The perioperative complication rate at 30 days was 3.5%. Outcomes were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Leadless cardiac pacing is a safe and efficient alternative to conventional transvenous cardiac pacing.

T Waves May Not Be What They Seem!

A 39-year-old women who received a transvenous dual-chamber pacemaker in childhood developed 20 years later severe tricuspid valve stenosis induced by the leads and worsened by a pseudo-pacemaker syndrome. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

Incidence of clinical atrial fibrillation and related complications using a screening algorithm at a nationwide level.

AIMS: In a recent position paper, the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) proposed an algorithm for the screening and management of arrhythmias using digital devices. In patients with prior stroke, a systematic screening approach for atrial fibrillation (AF) should always be implemented, preferably immediately after the event. Patients with increasing age and with specific cardiovascular or non-cardiovascular comorbidities are also deemed to be at higher risk. From a large nationwide database, the aim was to analyse AF incidence rates derived from this new EHRA algorithm. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the French administrative hospital discharge database, all patients hospitalized in 2012 without a history of AF, and with at least a 5-year follow-up (FU) (or if they died earlier), were included. The yearly incidence of AF was calculated in each subgroup defined by the algorithm proposed by EHRA based on a history of previous stroke, increasing age, and eight comorbidities identified via International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision codes. Out of the 4526 104 patients included (mean age 58.9 ± 18.9 years, 64.5% women), 1% had a history of stroke. Among those with no history of stroke, 18% were aged 65-74 years and 21% were ≥75 years. During FU, 327 012 patients had an incidence of AF (yearly incidence 1.86% in the overall population). Implementation of the EHRA algorithm divided the population into six risk groups: patients with a history of stroke (group 1); patients > 75 years (group 2); patients aged 65-74 years with or without comorbidity (groups 3a and 3b); and patients < 65 years with or without comorbidity (groups 4a and 4b). The yearly incidences of AF were 4.58% per year (group 2), 6.21% per year (group 2), 3.50% per year (group 3a), 2.01% per year (group 3b), 1.23% per year (group 4a), and 0.35% per year (group 4b). In patients aged < 65 years, the annual incidence of AF increased progressively according to the number of comorbidities from 0.35% (no comorbidities) to 9.08% (eight comorbidities). For those aged 65-75 years, the same trend was observed, i.e. increasing from 2.01% (no comorbidities) to 11.47% (eight comorbidities). CONCLUSION: These findings at a nationwide scale confirm the relevance of the subgroups in the EHRA algorithm for identifying a higher risk of AF incidence, showing that older patients (>75 years, regardless of comorbidities) have a higher incidence of AF than those with prior ischaemic stroke. Further studies are needed to evaluate the usefulness of algorithm-based risk stratification strategies for AF screening and the impact of screening on major cardiovascular event rates.

Atrial Fibrillation and the Risk of Ventricular Arrhythmias and Cardiac Arrest: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been linked to an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and sudden death. We investigated this association in hospitalised patients in France. METHODS: All hospitalised patients from 2013 were identified from the French National database and included if they had at least 5 years of follow-up data. RESULTS: Overall, 3,381,472 patients were identified. After excluding 35,834 with a history of VAs and cardiac arrest, 3,345,638 patients were categorised into two groups: no AF (n = 3,033,412; mean age 57.2 ± 21.4; 54.3% female) and AF (n = 312,226; 78.1 ± 10.6; 44.0% female). Over a median follow-up period of 5.4 years (interquartile range (IQR) 5.0-5.8 years), the incidence (2.23%/year vs. 0.56%/year) and risk (hazard ratio (HR) 3.657 (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.604-3.711)) of VAs and cardiac arrest were significantly higher in AF patients compared to non-AF patients. This was still significant after adjusting for confounders, with a HR of 1.167 (95% CI 1.111-1.226) and in the 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis (n = 289,332 per group), with a HR of 1.339 (95% CI 1.313-1.366). In the mediation analysis, the odds of cardiac arrest were significantly mediated by AF-associated VAs, with an OR of 1.041 (95% CI 1.040-1.042). CONCLUSION: In hospitalised French patients, AF was associated with an increased risk of VAs and sudden death.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation: recent advances and open questions.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) are frequently associated and can be caused or exacerbated by each other through different mechanisms. AF is particularly common in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50%, with a prevalence ranging around 40-60%.In two recent trials, treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors resulted in a lower risk of worsening heart failure or cardiovascular death than placebo in patients with HFpEF, and SGLT2 inhibitors similarly improved prognosis whether patients had AF or not at enrolment. Analyses for subgroups of interest of patients with HFpEF likely to be at higher risk of AF (particularly those with older age or obesity) similarly indicated a consistent benefit with SGLT2 inhibitors. That subgroup in patients with HFpEF is those with a history of previous HF with LVEF ≤ 40%. The EAST-AFNET 4 trial indicated that early rhythm-control therapy was associated with a lower risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes than usual care among patients with recent AF and cardiovascular conditions, including those with HF. In patients with AF and HF included in the CABANA trial, catheter ablation produced marked improvements in survival, freedom from AF recurrence, and quality of life compared to drug therapy. When strategies aiming at rhythm control eventually fail in patients with AF and HFpEF, a strategy of rate control with atrioventricular junction ablation and cardiac resynchronisation should be discussed since it may also reduce all-cause mortality.Finally, and in conclusion, considering that patients with AF and HFpEF may have a variety of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular additional comorbidities, they are among those likely to have the highest clinical benefit being adherent to a holistic and integrated care management of AF following the ABC (Atrial Fibrillation Better Care) pathway.

Prediction of incident atrial fibrillation in post-stroke patients using machine learning: a French nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: Targeting ischemic strokes patients at risk of incident atrial fibrillation (AF) for prolonged cardiac monitoring and oral anticoagulation remains a challenge. Clinical risk scores have been developed to predict post-stroke AF with suboptimal performances. Machine learning (ML) models are developing in the field of AF prediction and may be used to discriminate post-stroke patients at risk of new onset AF. This study aimed to evaluate ML models for the prediction of AF and to compare predictive ability to usual clinical scores. METHODS: Based on a French nationwide cohort of 240,459 ischemic stroke patients without AF at baseline from 2009 to 2012, ML models were trained on a train set and the best model was selected to be evaluate on the test set. Discrimination of the best model was evaluated using the C index. We finally compared our best model with previously described clinical scores. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 7.9 ± 11.5 months, 14,095 patients (mean age 77.6 ± 10.6; 50.3% female) developed incident AF. After training, the best ML model selected was a deep neural network with a C index of 0.77 (95% CI 0.76-0.78) on the test set. Compared to traditional clinical scores, the selected model was statistically significantly superior to the CHA2DS2-VASc score, Framingham risk score, HAVOC score and C2HEST score (P < 0.0001). The ability to predict AF was improved as shown by net reclassification index increase (P < 0.0001) and decision curve analysis. CONCLUSIONS: ML algorithms predict incident AF post-stroke with a better ability than previously developed clinical scores. AF: atrial fibrillation; DNN: deep neural network; IS: ischemic stroke; KNN: K-nearest neighbors; LR: logistic regression; RFC: random forest classifier; XGBoost: extreme gradient boosting.

Dual-chamber ICD for left bundle branch area pacing: the cardiac resynchronization and arrhythmia sensing via the left bundle (cross-left) pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has emerged as a promising technique to deliver cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, safety and efficacy of ventricular arrhythmia sensing via the left bundle in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients remain unclear. We sought to evaluate the feasibility of a single LBBAP lead connected to a dual-chamber ICD in patients indicated with a CRT-D implantation. METHODS: The CROSS-LEFT pilot study prospectively included 10 consecutive patients with a reduced ejection fraction and a complete left bundle branch block, indicated with a prophylactic CRT-D. A DF-1 lead was implanted at the right ventricular (RV) apex, and an LBBAP lead through the interventricular septum. Ventricular fibrillation was induced at implantation in both conventional (RV) and left bundle branch area sensing configurations. The latter was the final sensing configuration, and patients were implanted with a dual-chamber DF-1 ICD connected to the atrial lead (RA port), the LBBAP lead (RV IS-1 port), and the defibrillation lead (RV DF-1 port), the IS-1 pin being capped. Atrioventricular delay was optimized to ensure fusion between LBBAP and native conduction from the right bundle. Patients were followed during 6 months. RESULTS: No difference between both configurations was observed regarding R-wave sensing in sinus rhythm (p = 0.22), ventricular fibrillation median interval detection (p = 1.00), or total induced episode duration (p = 0.78). LBBAP resulted in a significant reduction of median QRS width from 164 to 126 ms (p = 0.002). Median ventricular sensing significantly improved from 9.7 at implantation to 18.8 mV at 6 months (p = 0.01). Median LVEF also significantly improved from 29 to 44% at 6 months (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Ventricular arrhythmia sensing and defibrillation can be performed via a single LBBAP lead connected to a dual-chamber ICD, and is associated with significant electromechanical reverse remodeling. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05102227 In patients presenting with left bundle branch block and left ventricular systolic dysfunction, a left bundle branch area pacing lead connected to a DF-1 dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator provides safe ventricular arrhythmia sensing and efficient electro-mechanical resynchronization.

Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Non-Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage and Ischemic Stroke Survivors.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate different measures of adverse cardiovascular events between non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICrH) and ischemic stroke (IS) survivors with and without atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Using a national hospitalization database we compared incidences and risks of all-cause in-hospital death, cardiovascular death, non-cardiovascular death, MACE-HF (in-hospital cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, IS or new-onset heart failure [HF]) between ICrH and IS survivors with and without AF. Propensity-score matching was also performed. RESULTS: We identified 40,523 survivors of IS and 12,028 survivors of an ICrH without AF, and 20,449 IS survivors and 3574 ICrH survivors with AF. In unadjusted, adjusted and matched analyses, ICrH patients without AF had a higher risk of all-cause in-hospital death (Hazard Ratio (HR; for matched analyses) 1.80; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.74-1.86), cardiovascular death (HR; 2.79; CI 2.64-2.94), MACE-HF (HR 1.97; CI 1.89-2.06) and new cerebrovascular events (HR 1.75; CI 1.57-1.96) but with lower risk of myocardial infarction (HR 0.81; CI 0.70-0.94), major bleeding (HR 0.92; CI 0.87-0.98) and new onset HF (HR 0.85; CI 0.79-0.91) compared to IS survivors without AF. Similar results were found for ICrH and IS survivors with AF except for myocardial infarction (HR 1.05; CI 0.79-1.34) and new onset HF (HR 0.94; CI 0.84-1.06) that were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse cardiovascular events are more frequent in ICrH survivors compared to IS survivors. New onset HF is a relatively frequent event after ICrH, especially in those patients with comorbid atrial fibrillation.

Leadless or Conventional Transvenous Ventricular Permanent Pacemakers: A Nationwide Matched Control Study.

Background Leadless ventricular permanent pacemakers (leadless VVI or LPM) were designed to reduce lead-related complications of conventional VVI pacemakers (CPM). The aim of our study was to assess and compare real-life clinical outcomes within the first 30 days and during a midterm follow-up with the 2 techniques. Methods and Results This French longitudinal cohort study was based on the national hospitalization database. All adults (age ≥18 years) hospitalized in French hospitals from January 1, 2017 to September 1, 2020, who underwent a first LPM or CPM were included. The study included 40 828 patients with CPM and 1487 with LPM. After propensity score matching 1344 patients with CPM were matched 1:1 with patients treated with LPM. Patients with LPM had a lower rate of all-cause and cardiovascular death within the 30 days after implantation. During subsequent follow-up (mean: 8.6±10.5 months), risk of all-cause death in the unmatched population was significantly higher in the LPM group than in the CPM group, whereas risk of cardiovascular death and of endocarditis was not significantly different. After matching on all baseline characteristics including comorbidities (mean follow-up 6.2±8.7 months), all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and infective endocarditis were not statistically different in the 2 groups. Conclusions Patients treated with leadless VVI pacemakers had better clinical outcomes in the first month compared with the patients treated with conventional VVI pacing. During a midterm follow-up, risk of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and endocarditis in patients treated with leadless VVI pacemaker was not statistically different after propensity score matching.

Mortality and Major Cardiovascular Events among Patients with Multiple Myeloma: Analysis from a Nationwide French Medical Information Database.

BACKGROUND: No robust data assesses the risk of all-cause death and cardiovascular (CV) events in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1 January to 31 December 2013, 3,381,472 adults were hospitalised (for any reason) in French hospitals. We identified 15,774 patients diagnosed with known MM at baseline. The outcome analysis (all-cause death, CV death, myocardial infarction (MI), ischaemic stroke, or hospitalization for bleedings) was performed with follow-ups starting at the time of the last event. For each MM patient, a propensity score-matched patient without MM was selected. RESULTS: The mean follow-up in the propensity-score-matched population was 3.7 ± 2.3 years. Matched patients with MM had a higher risk of all-death (yearly rate 20.02 vs. 11.39%) than patients without MM. No difference was observed between the MM group and no-MM group for CV death (yearly rate 2.00 vs. 2.02%). The incidence rate of MI and stroke was lower in the MM group: 0.86 vs. 0.97%/y and 0.85 vs. 1.10%/y, respectively. In contrast, MM patients had a higher incidence rate of rehospitalization for major bleeding (3.61 vs. 2.24%/y) and intracranial bleeding (1.03 vs. 0.84%/y). CONCLUSIONS: From a large nationwide database, we demonstrated that MM patients do not have a higher risk of CV death or even a lower risk of both MI and ischaemic stroke. Conversely, MM patients had a higher risk of both major and intracranial bleedings, highlighting the key issue of thromboprophylaxis in these patients.

Predicting outcome after cardiac resynchronisation therapy defibrillator implantation: the cardiac resynchronisation therapy defibrillator Futility score.

BACKGROUND: Risk-benefit for cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) defibrillator (CRT-D) over CRT pacemaker remains a matter of debate. We aimed to identify patients with a poor outcome within 1 year of CRT-D implantation, and to develop a CRT-D Futility score. METHODS: Based on an administrative hospital-discharge database, all consecutive patients treated with prophylactic CRT-D implantation in France (2010-2019) were included. A prediction model was derived and validated for 1-year all-cause death after CRT-D implantation (considered as futility) by using split-sample validation. RESULTS: Among 23 029 patients (mean age 68±10 years; 4873 (21.2%) women), 7016 deaths were recorded (yearly incidence rate 7.2%), of which 1604 (22.8%) occurred within 1 year of CRT-D implantation. In the derivation cohort (n=11 514), the final logistic regression model included-as main predictors of futility-older age, diabetes, mitral regurgitation, aortic stenosis, history of hospitalisation with heart failure, history of pulmonary oedema, atrial fibrillation, renal disease, liver disease, undernutrition and anaemia. Area under the curve for the CRT-D Futility score was 0.716 (95% CI: 0.698 to 0.734) in the derivation cohort and 0.692 (0.673 to 0.710) in the validation cohort. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test had a p-value of 0.57 suggesting accurate calibration. The CRT-D Futility score outperformed the Goldenberg and EAARN scores for identifying futility. Based on the CRT-D Futility score, 15.9% of these patients were categorised at high risk (predicted futility of 16.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The CRT-D Futility score, established from a large nationwide cohort of patients treated with CRT-D, may be a relevant tool for optimising healthcare decision-making.

Yearly Incidence of Stroke and Bleeding in Atrial Fibrillation with Concomitant Hyperthyroidism: A National Discharge Database Study.

Background: Hyperthyroidism is associated with atrial fibrillation (AF), and the latter is a major risk factor for stroke. Aim: We aimed to investigate the yearly incidence of stroke and bleeding in AF patients with and without concomitant hyperthyroidism from the French National Hospital Discharge Database. Methods: Admissions with AF between January 2010 and December 2019 were retrospectively identified and retrieved from the French national database. Incidence rates of ischaemic stroke and bleeding were compared in AF patients with and without concomitant hyperthyroidism. The associations of risk factors with ischaemic stroke were assessed by Cox regression. Results: Overall 2,421,087 AF patients, among whom 32,400 had concomitant hyperthyroidism were included in the study. During the follow-up (mean: 2.0 years, standard deviation SD: 2.2 years), the yearly incidence of ischaemic stroke was noted to be 2.6 (95% confidence interval CI: 2.5−2.8) in AF patients with concomitant hyperthyroidism, and 2.3 (95%CI: 2.3−2.4) in non-thyroid AF patients. Hyperthyroidism was noted as an independent risk factor for ischaemic stroke (adjusted hazard ratio aHR: 1.133, 95%CI: 1.080−1.189) overall, particularly within the first year of hyperthyroidism diagnosis (aHR 1.203, 95%CI 1.120−1.291), however, the association became non-significant in subsequent years (aHR 1.047, 95%CI 0.980−1.118). Major bleeding incidence was lower in the hyperthyroid AF group in comparison to the non-thyroid AF group (incidence ratio: 5.1 vs. 5.4%/year, p < 0.001). The predictive value of CHA2DS2VASc and HAS-BLED scores for ischaemic stroke and bleeding events, respectively, did not differ significantly between AF patients with or without concomitant hyperthyroidism. Conclusions: Hyperthyroidism seems to be an independent risk factor of ischaemic stroke in AF patients, particularly within the first year of hyperthyroidism diagnosis.

Physiological pacing with a DF-1 single chamber defibrillator in a patient with permanent atrial fibrillation and heart block: A case report.

We report a case report of a 68-year-old man with chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy and uncontrolled permanent atrial fibrillation. Cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation and atrioventricular junction ablation were planned. DF-1 single chamber defibrillator was connected to lead's defibrillation and a lead destinated to left bundle branch area pacing. This system leads to reduce costs by one-third, improve battery longevity, and provide a more physiological pacing.